Prediction of Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs Lana Popadic Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs L. Popadic

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger
Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger

Flag GEO GEO

w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
Lana Popadic
Lana Popadic

Flag CRO CRO

l
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

42
Age
42
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
134
Best Rank
182
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$30.0K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger 1 - 0 Popadic

They have played 2 sets in total, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 2 and Lana Popadic winning 0. The last match between Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger and Lana Popadic was at the Tbilisi, 16-09-2002, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger1
Popadic0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2Tbilisi(09-16-02)

Clay
GEO Flag
Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger
7
6
CRO Flag
Lana Popadic
6
1

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs L. Popadic H2H Profile

Stats
$29,995Career Prize Money$0
53.24% (304-267)Career Total W/L45.57% (36-43)
1Clay0
10Titles0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs L. Popadic Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Lana Popadic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lana Popadic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lana Popadic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Lana Popadic winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 216/155), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/5). Lana Popadic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 27/29), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 4/7).
  • Player level: In the last year, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Lana Popadic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 1 times and Lana Popadic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 2 and Lana Popadic winning 0.
  • The last match between Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger and Lana Popadic was at the Tbilisi, 16-09-2002, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Lana Popadic has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lana Popadic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lana Popadic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs Lana Popadic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs L. Popadic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
13Games Won7
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger 0%, Popadic 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger 0%, Popadic 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger 0%, Popadic 0%.

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayAntalya - 12-12-2016

R1

NORU. Eikeri
L
6-4 6-0

Q3

TURE. Kokce
W
2-6 6-0 6-2
ClayTelavi - 14-09-2015

R2

RUSP. Novikova
L
7-6(10) 6-4

R1

RUSA. Pribylova
W
4-6 6-3 6-3
ClayBeinasco - 23-02-2015

R1

ITAG. Barbieri
L
7-5 6-3

L. Popadic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardCapriolo - 07-02-2005

R1

HUNR. Kuti
L
7-5 6-2
HardAustralian Open - Melbourne - 17-01-2005

Q2

CZEZ. Ondraskova
L
6-3 6-2

Q1

GERA. Barna
W
3-6 7-5 6-1
I.hardValasske Mezirici - 13-12-2004

R1

UKRE. Tatarkova
L
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4
HardU.S. Open - New York - 30-08-2004

Q2

POLM. Domachowska
L
6-0 6-3
banner

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs L. Popadic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
53.52% (304/264)YTD Win/Loss45.57% (36/43)
52.17% (686/629)Sets Win/Loss45.86% (83/98)
50.84% (6109/5908)Games Win/Loss48.85% (825/864)
48.96% (47/49)Hard Win/Loss36.36% (4/7)
58.22% (216/155)Clay Win/Loss48.21% (27/29)
42.71% (41/55)Indoor Hard W/L41.67% (5/7)
0.00% (0/5)Grass Win/Loss0% (0/0)
0.01Aces Per Game0
67Aces Total0
0.04Double Faults Per Game0.01
213Total Double Faults11
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
587.6Average Opponent Rank524.11
62% (2372/3855)1st Serve %69% (132/191)
55% (1304/2372)1st Serve Win %49% (65/132)
41% (615/1483)2nd Serve Win %37% (20/54)
47% (193/413)Break Points Won % (Total)45% (15/33)
43% (1609/3719)Return Points Win %47% (99/210)
18.18% (4/18)Slam W/L40.00% (2/3)
25.00% (1/3)Masters W/L0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/3)Cups W/L0% (0/0)
38.78% (19/30)Main Tour W/L53.85% (7/6)
54.78% (235/194)Challenger W/L44.26% (27/34)
73.77% (45/16)Futures W/L0% (0/0)
53% (299/559)Best of 3 Sets Win %46% (36/79)
25% (1/4)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/0)
48% (60/124)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)58% (11/19)
55% (99/179)Deciding Set Win %52% (12/23)
87% (282/244)1st Set Won, Won Match88% (33/29)
13% (282/38)1st Set Won, Lost Match12% (33/4)
21% (286/59)1st Set Lost, Won Match15% (46/7)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

06:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ARGA. Collarini8
ARGM. Zeituneq
W1
1.119
W2
5.15
03:15 AM 21/11/25
Prediction
ARGH. Casanova
ECUA. G. Meza4
W1
2.84
W2
1.36
02:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ROUC. Cretuq
ARGM. Trungelliti2
W1
2.46
W2
1.47
10:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ESTM. Lajal7
GERJ. Engel
W1
1.7
W2
2.01
12:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
GBRP. Brady
GREI. Xilas5
W1
2.08
W2
1.65
02:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ITAG. Cadenassoq
FRAC. Tabur5
W1
1.8
W2
1.88